Microsoft Corporation v. United States Department of Justice et al
Microsoft Corporation |
United States Department of Justice and Loretta Lynch |
2:2016cv00538 |
April 14, 2016 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
King |
James L. Robart |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 119 ORDER granting Plaintiff's unopposed 117 Motion to Dismiss and dismissing case without prejudice or costs to any party. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM) |
Filing 113 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Judge James L. Robart. (PM) |
Filing 107 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 38 Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) by Defendants Loretta Lynch, United States Department of Justice; by Judge James L. Robart.(RM) |
Filing 103 MINUTE ORDER REGARDING HEARING ON JANUARY 23, 2017 directing parties to be prepared to discuss the issue addressed in this order. The parties may, but are not required to, file a supplemental brief prior to oral argument on Monday, January 23, 2017. Authorized by Judge James L. Robart. (PM) |
Filing 46 ORDER ON MOTIONS TO INTERVENE by Judge James L. Robart. The court DENIES the motions to intervene (Dkt. ## 12 , 13 ) and GRANTS the ACLU amicus curiae status (Dkt. # 43 ). (AD) cc: Stephen Wallace |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.