Tucker v. British Airways PLC et al
| Frederick Tucker |
| British Airways PLC, Omniserv Limited, Air Serv Corporation and ABM Industries |
| 2:2016cv00618 |
| April 28, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| Island |
| Richard A Jones |
| Airplane |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
ORDER denying without prejudice Plaintiff's 56 Motion to Reopen Action Pending Completion of Settlement. Signed by Judge Richard A. Jones. (PM)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER granting Omni Defendants' 48 Motion for Reconsideration. Upon reconsideration, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Omni Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Dkt. # 26 . The Court GRANTS the motion as to Plaintiff's claims. This Order does not alter the Court's prior decision with regard to British Airways' cross-claims. The Court has personal jurisdiction over Omni Defendants for purposes of those claims. The Court DENIES Omni Defendants' motion to strike embedded in its Reply. Dkt. # 39 . Signed by Judge Richard A Jones. (PM)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER denying Defendants' 26 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction; and denying Defendants' 42 Motion to Amend Answer to Cross-Claims. Signed by Judge Richard A Jones.(TH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
