Integrity Trust et al v. Capital One, N.A. et al
Integrity Trust |
Capital One NA, Chevy Chase Bank, FSB, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc, Chicago Title Co and John Does 1-50 |
2:2016cv00927 |
June 17, 2016 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
King |
Robert S. Lasnik |
Truth in Lending |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 STIPULATION AND ORDER of Dismissal re parties' 46 Stipulated Motion; all claims in this lawsuit are dismissed with prejudice and without costs to any party, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) |
Filing 45 ORDER denying Plaintiff's 44 Motion for Reconsideration of Sanctions, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(SWT) |
Filing 41 ORDER Awarding Fees and Dismissing Case, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) |
Filing 39 ORDER granting Defendants Capital One NA and MERS' 29 Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions and Attorneys' Fees; Defendants are ordered to submit a statement of reasonable attorneys' fees incurred in defending this action within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) |
Filing 33 STIPULATION AND ORDER RENOTING 29 MOTION for Sanctions and Attorneys' Fees; Noting Date 2/24/2017, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. Plaintiff's response due by 2/15/17. Defendants' reply due by 2/24/17. (KERR) |
Filing 27 ORDER granting MERS'S 15 Motion to Dismiss and Capital One's Motion for Summary Judgment by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(RS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.