Hallowell v. Safeway, Inc et al
Mary Hallowell |
Safeway, Inc and Jane Doe |
2:2016cv00972 |
June 24, 2016 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
King |
Thomas S. Zilly |
Personal Injury: Health Care |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 ORDER granting defendant's 21 Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing this lawsuit without prejudice; denying defendant's request for fees and costs incurred bringing the motion; denying plaintiff's request for leave to amend the Complaint, signed by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT) |
Filing 18 STIPULATION AND ORDER re: Plaintiff's Medical Examination pursuant to FRCP 35; Order re: Plaintiff's Medical Examination; re parties' 17 Stipulated Motion, signed by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT) |
Filing 16 ORDER granting 15 Stipulated Motion to Continue Trial and Pretrial Motions. Jury Trial is continued to 4/16/2018 before Judge Thomas S. Zilly. Expert Witness Disclosure/Reports under FRCP 26(a)(2) due by 9/19/2017, Discovery Motions due by 9/19 /2017, Discovery completed by 1/2/2018, Dispositive motions due by 1/18/2018, Motions in Limine due by 3/15/2018, Agreed Pretrial Order due by 3/29/2018, Voir dire/jury instructions/trial briefs due by 3/29/2018, Pretrial Conference set for 4/6/2018 at 02:00 PM before Judge Thomas S. Zilly. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (PM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.