Earthbound Corporation et al v. MiTek USA et al
| Earthbound Corporation and Intact Structural Supply, LLC |
| MiTek USA, Inc, Ken Keyse, Cindy Keyse, James Miller, Linda Miller, Jason Birdwell and Lachelle Birdwell |
| 2:2016cv01150 |
| July 25, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| Snohomish |
| Ricardo S Martinez |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1030 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
ORDER granting plaintiffs' 67 Motion for Disbursement of Funds signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS) cc fin'l
|
|
Filing
66
MINUTE ORDER directing plaintiff to request by motion if they wish funds to be withdrawn, transferred or otherwise distributed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (RS)
|
|
Filing
64
MINUTE ORDER directing Plaintiff to file a Status Report no later than 8/10/2017, advising whether the Court should continue to hold bond funds. Authorized by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY, AND SCHEDULING HEARING FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. Plaintiffs' 17 Motion for TRO is GRANTED; Preliminary Injunction Hearing set for 9/28/2016 at 09:30 AM before Judge Ricardo S Martinez. Earthbound shall post a bond in the amount of $1,000.00. (AD) cc: financial
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
