C.F. et al v. Lashway et al
C. F., J. P. and L. B. |
Patricia Lashway and Dorothy F Teeter |
2:2016cv01205 |
August 2, 2016 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
King |
Ricardo S Martinez |
Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 86 ORDER granting parties' 85 Joint Motion to Extend Deadlines: Expert Witness Disclosure/Reports under FRCP 26(a)(2) due by 6/27/2018, Discovery Motions due by 7/13/2018, signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(SWT) |
Filing 76 ORDER denying Plaintiffs' 73 Motion for Reconsideration and request for relief from the 1/17/2018 deadline to file amended complaint. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM) |
Filing 72 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiffs' 64 Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint; Plaintiffs' amended complaint must be filed within seven (7) days of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (SWT) Counsel is directed to e-file their Amended Complaint |
Filing 59 ORDER denying plaintiffs' 21 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS) |
Filing 58 ORDER denying plaintiffs' 18 Motion to Certify Class signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS) |
Filing 57 ORDER granting plaintiffs' 17 Motion to Seal by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.