Hover et al v. GMAC Mortgage Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Lynn Hover and Mila Hover
Defendant: GMAC Mortgage Corporation, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems MERS, Federal Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae), Residential Mortgage Lender, Nationstar Mortgage LLC, Northwest Trustee Services, Inc. and John or Jane Does 1 -100, unknown Investors, Agents, et al
Case Number: 2:2016cv01243
Filed: August 8, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Seattle Office
County: King
Presiding Judge: James L. Robart
Nature of Suit: All Other Real Property
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER affirming Judge Robart's denial of plaintiffs' 32 Motion to recuse by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS) cc plaintiffs
April 25, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER construing Plaintiff's 32 "objections" as a motion to reconsider. The court denies the Hoovers' motion and refers this issue to Chief Judge Ricardo S. Martinez for further review. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM) cc: Plaintiffs via the USPS
April 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER dismissing the Hovers' claims against Remaining Defendants without prejudice. Because all of the Hovers' claims have been dismissed, the court directs the Clerk to enter judgment and terminate this action. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM) cc: Plaintiffs via the USPS
March 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER STRIKING the Hovers' libel claim, GRANTING Defendants Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., and Federal National Mortgage Association's motion to dismiss (Dkt. # 20 ), and DISMISSING with prejudic e the Hovers' claims against Moving Defendants for private nuisance, unjust enrichment, and fraud. The court further ORDERS the Hovers to SHOW CAUSE within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order why their claims against Non-Moving Defendants should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to serve. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM) cc: Plaintiffs via the USPS
September 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER by Judge James L. Robart. The court GRANTS in part Moving Defendants' 7 motion to dismiss and DISMISSES the Hovers' claims against Moving Defendants; the court GRANTS the Hovers 15 days to amend the complaint; Ms. Schrader's 9 motion to withdraw is DENIED as moot. (AD) Modified on 9/8/2016 cc plaintiffs (AD).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hover et al v. GMAC Mortgage Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lynn Hover
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mila Hover
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GMAC Mortgage Corporation
Represented By: Rebecca R. Shrader
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems MERS
Represented By: Rebecca R. Shrader
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae)
Represented By: Rebecca R. Shrader
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Residential Mortgage Lender
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nationstar Mortgage LLC
Represented By: Rebecca R. Shrader
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Northwest Trustee Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John or Jane Does 1 -100, unknown Investors, Agents, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?