Rubio v. Public Health Seattle King County et al
Brandon J Rubio |
Public Health Seattle King County, Jail Health Services, Sanders, Bill Danforth and Bette Pine |
2:2016cv01307 |
August 17, 2016 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
King |
John C Coughenour |
Brian A Tsuchida |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 ORDER GRANTING 46 Stipulated Motion To Dismiss with Prejudice signed by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida.(AE) |
Filing 42 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida. (AE) |
Filing 35 ORDER SETTING TRIAL CONFERENCE AND DIRECTING SUBMISSION OF A JOINT INDVIDUALIZED TRIAL STATEMENT by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida. Individualized Trial Conference set for 7/28/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 12A before Hon. Brian A Tsuchida. The parties are directed to file a Joint Individualized Trial Statement pursuant to Local Civil Rule 39.2(f) no later than July 21, 2017.(AE) |
Filing 32 ORDER REGARDING INTENT TO UTILIZE THE INDIVIDUALIZED TRIAL PROGRAM, LCR 39.2; The parties shall either request an individualized trial by filing the appropriate court form, or notify the Court in writing of any decision not to utilize the individualized trial program no later than June 30, 2017 by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida. (RS) |
Filing 31 ORDER by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida denying Plaintiff's pro se 29 motion for an extension of a discovery deadline. (PM) cc: Plaintiff via the USPS |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.