Sampaga v. Snohomish County et al
| Jason Sampaga |
| Snohomish County, Mark Roe, The City of Everett, Everett Police Department, Dan Templeman, Joe Neussendorfer, Deb Coleman, Peter Noetzel and Suzanne Eviston |
| Mark Roe and Snohomish County |
| Jason Sampaga |
| 2:2016cv01310 |
| August 18, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| Snohomish |
| Richard A Jones |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER granting Defendants' 25 Motion for Summary Judgment. This case was removed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Because the Court has dismissed the federal claim that was the basis of federal question jurisdiction, the Court directs the Clerk to REMAND this matter to the Snohomish County Superior Court.Per LCR 3(i), case will be remanded 14 days from the date of this Order, on 1/2/2018. Signed by Judge Richard A Jones. (TH)
|
|
Filing
24
CORRECTED ORDER granting defendants' 16 motion for summary judgment and dismissing all claims asserted against defendants Snohomish County and Mark Roe by Judge Richard A Jones. (RS)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER granting Defendants Snohomish County's and Mark Roe's 13 Motion to Stay Discovery. Signed by Judge Richard A Jones. (swt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
