Mohammed et al v. United States of America, Bonneville Power Administration et al
Hevi Mohammed, Dawood Amedi, Kavi Mohammed and Amedi's Landscaping |
United States of America, Bonneville Power Administration and Resource Management Associates, Inc |
2:2016cv01552 |
October 4, 2016 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
Pierce |
Richard A Jones |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2271 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 91 STIPULATION AND ORDER re parties' 90 Stipulated Motion for Dismissal of all Claims Against the United States of America. It is ORDERED that all claims against the United States of America are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party, and the parties' respective motions filed at Dkt 42 , 44 and 83 are terminated as moot. Signed by Judge Richard A Jones. (TH) |
Filing 81 ORDER granting Defendant Resource Management Associates, Inc.'s 65 Motion to Compel and Motion to Amend Case Schedule; and denying Plaintiffs' 62 Motion to Strike Defendants' rebuttal expert witnesses. The Court will continue the trial until August 13, 2018. Signed by Judge Richard A Jones. (TH) |
Filing 61 ORDER denying Defendant Resource Management Associates, Inc.'s 30 Motion to Continue Trial Date and Modify Case Schedule. Signed by Judge Richard A Jones. (TH) |
Filing 25 ORDER granting Austin Mutual Insurance Company's 18 Motion to Intervene signed by Judge Richard A Jones. (TH) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.