Kitazi v. Sellen Construction Company Inc et al
| Eric Kitazi |
| Sellen Construction Company Inc, Robert P McCleskey, Jane Doe McCleskey, Kate Harkess and Ken Knudsen |
| 2:2016cv01651 |
| October 21, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Thomas S. Zilly |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
103
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 87 Motion for Attorneys' Fees in the amount of $148,422.50. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM)
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER denying Defendant's 86 Motion for Remittitur. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER granting Defendants' 59 -1 64 Amended Motions in Limine. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER granting defendants' Motions to Strike (dkt. ## 32 , 35 ); denying Defendant Sellen's 32 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting Defendants Kate Harkess and Ken Knudsen's 35 Motion for Summary Judgment; This case will proceed to trial on all claims against Defendant Sellen. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman.(SWT) (Kate Harkess and Ken Knudsen terminated.)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER granting 38 Stipulated Motion to Dismiss, with prejudice, Various Causes of Action from Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER denying Defendants' Motion for Leave to File an Overlength Brief 29 by Judge Marsha J. Pechman.(lp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
