Accretive Technology Group, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al
Accretive Technology Group, Inc. and Accretive Technology Group Inc |
Cisco Systems, Inc, Cisco Capital Corporation, Cisco Systems, Inc. and Cisco Systems Capital Corporation |
2:2016cv01668 |
October 26, 2016 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
King |
Robert S Lasnik |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of case by Plaintiff Accretive Technology Group, Inc. (Odom, Jeffrey) |
Filing 20 ORDER GRANTING #19 STIPULATED MOTION EXTENDING ANSWER AND RULE 26 DEADLINES; The date for Cisco's answer is extended for 45 days. All deadlines set in the Court's November 17, 2016 Order are extended for 45 days, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (KERR) |
Filing 19 Joint Stipulated MOTION Extending Answer and Rule 26 Deadlines by Defendants Cisco Capital Corporation, Cisco Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 11/23/2016, (Axel, Bradford) |
Filing 18 ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT AND EARLY SETTLEMENT Joint Status Report due by 12/15/2016, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (KERR) |
Filing 17 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint by Counsel Robert L. Michels, on behalf of Defendants, on 11/7/2016. (Odom, Jeffrey) |
Filing 16 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Cisco Systems, Inc. for Cisco Systems Capital Corporation. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Cisco Systems Capital Corporation, Cisco Systems, Inc. (Gebhardt, Shawn) |
Filing 15 ORDER granting #10 Stipulated Motion permitting withdraw plaintiff's #2 Motion for TRO by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(RS) |
Filing 14 ORDER re #9 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Shawn J Gebhardt for Cisco Systems Capital Corporation and for Cisco Systems, Inc., by Clerk William M McCool. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(DS) |
Filing 13 ORDER re #8 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Robert L. Michels for Cisco Systems Capital Corporation and for Cisco Systems, Inc., by Clerk William M McCool. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(DS) |
Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Accretive Technology Group, Inc. (Odom, Jeffrey) |
Filing 11 Summons Issued as to defendant(s) Cisco Systems Capital Corporation, Cisco Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(RS) |
Filing 10 Joint Stipulated MOTION Withdrawing Plaintiff's Accretive Technology Group, Inc.'s Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order by Defendants Cisco Systems Capital Corporation, Cisco Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 10/31/2016, (Axel, Bradford) |
Filing 9 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Shawn J. Gebhardt FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendants Cisco Systems Capital Corporation, Cisco Systems, Inc. (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 0981-4656844 (Axel, Bradford) |
Filing 8 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Robert L. Michels FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendants Cisco Systems Capital Corporation, Cisco Systems, Inc. (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 0981-4656831 (Axel, Bradford) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Bradford J Axel on behalf of Defendants Cisco Systems Capital Corporation, Cisco Systems, Inc.. (Axel, Bradford) |
Filing 6 ORDER DIRECTING CORRECTION OF CASE CAPTION by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. Clerk directed to revise the case caption to reflect the correct defendant names: "Cisco Systems, Inc.," and "Cisco Systems Capital Corporation." (AD) |
Filing 5 PRAECIPE Correcting Case Caption by Plaintiff Accretive Technology Group, Inc. (Odom, Jeffrey) |
Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT filed by Plaintiff Accretive Technology Group, Inc. re #2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Odom, Jeffrey) |
Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT filed by Plaintiff Accretive Technology Group, Inc. re #2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7)(Odom, Jeffrey) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Plaintiff Accretive Technology Group, Inc.. Oral Argument Requested. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 10/26/2016, (Odom, Jeffrey) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against All Defendants (Receipt # 0981-4650453) Attorney Jeffrey M Odom added to party Accretive Technology Group, Inc.(pty:pla), filed by Accretive Technology Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Cisco Systems, Inc., #3 Summons Cisco Systems Capital Corporation)(Odom, Jeffrey) |
Judge Robert S. Lasnik added. (ST) |
NOTICE TO FILER: When opening a new case, the filer must add all of the attorneys who signed the complaint. In this case, Andrew G Yates was not entered as counsel for the plaintiff. The docket has now been updated. (ST) |
NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1, Plaintiff(s) must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 11/2/2016. (ST) |
NOTICE TO FILER: When opening a new case, the filer is responsible for entering party text exactly as it appears on the complaint. For example, a Washington corporation should have been entered as party text for Accretive Technology Group, Inc. If you have questions about party text, please refer to the Attorney's Guide to Opening a Civil Case on the court's website at wawd.uscourts.gov. The docket has now been corrected. Thank you. (ST) |
NOTICE TO FILER: When opening a new case, the filer must enter party names exactly as they appear on the complaint. In this case, Cisco Capital Corporation was incorrectly entered as Cisco Systems Capital Corporation. The docket has now been updated. Thank you. (ST) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.