Sia et al v. Airasia Berhad et al
| Henry Tanaya Sia and Theresia Tanaya Song |
| Airasia Berhad, Honeywell International Inc, Goodrich Corporation, Danaher Corporation and Artus, S.A.S. |
| 2:2016cv01692 |
| November 1, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Richard A Jones |
| Airplane |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Counsel having advised the Court that this matter has been resolved, and it appearing that no issue remains for the Court's determination, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs. In the event settlement is not perfected, either party may move to reopen and trial will be scheduled, provided such motion is filed within 60 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
88
MINUTE ORDER granting parties' 87 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time for Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens; RENOTING defendants' 73 Joint MOTION to Dismiss For Forum Non Conveniens : Noting Date 3/2/2018. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
86
MINUTE ORDER granting parties' 85 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time for Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; RENOTING defendants' 73 MOTION to Dismiss For Forum Non Conveniens : Noting Date 2/2/2018, authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
84
MINUTE ORDER granting parties' 83 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to File Joint Status Report and Exchange Initial Disclosures; The deadline to file a Joint Status Report and exchange Initial Disclosures is extended from 11/27/2017 to thirty (30) days after the Court's ruling on defendants' motion to dismiss, docket no. 73 . Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
82
MINUTE ORDER granting parties' 81 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time; RENOTING defendants' 73 Joint MOTION to Dismiss For Forum Non Conveniens : Noting Date 12/15/2017, authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
80
MINUTE ORDER granting 79 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants' 73 Joint Motion to Dismiss For Forum Non Conveniens is RENOTED for 11/17/2017. Response due 11/8/2017, Reply due on or before new noting date. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (PM)
|
|
Filing
78
MINUTE ORDER granting parties' 77 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time; RENOTING Defendants' 73 Joint MOTION to Dismiss For Forum Non Conveniens : Noting Date 10/13/2017, Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
76
MINUTE ORDER granting parties' 75 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time; RENOTING Defendants' 73 Joint Motion to Dismiss For Forum Non Conveniens : Noting Date 9/1/2017, authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER granting Defendant Artus, S.A.S' 50 Motion to Dismiss; granting Defendant Airasia Berhad 58 Motion to Dismiss; plaintiffs' claims against defendant Artus and defendant AirAsia Berhad are DISMISSED without prejudice, by Judge Thomas S. Zilly.(SWT)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER granting 62 Stipulated Motion for order relating to the motion to dismiss of dft Danaher Corporation; granting dft Danaher Corp's 47 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; pltfs granted leave to amend their complaint as to dft Danaher Corp within 30 days by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
