Schmidt v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: George Schmidt
Defendant: Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung SDI America, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2016cv01725
Filed: November 4, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Seattle Office
County: Snohomish
Presiding Judge: John C Coughenour
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 23, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 75 MINUTE ORDER granting 74 Stipulated motion to extend the deadline to file a notice of appeal from 6/26/2017 to 7/26/2017. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (PM)
May 25, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER granting in part Defendant Samsung SDI America's 40 Motion to Dismiss ; granting in part Samsung Electronics America, Inc.'s 43 Motion to Compel ; granting in part Defendant Samsung Electronics Co.'s 46 Motion to Compel ; dismissing as moot Defendants' 47 Motion to Dismiss, by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (SWT)
May 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER granting Plaintiffs' 52 Motion for appointment of interim co-lead class counsel. Plaintiffs' current counsel, Keller Rohrback L.L.P and McCune Wright Arevalo L.L.P., are hereby appointed interim co-lead class counsel. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (PM)
March 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 57 MINUTE ORDER granting parties' 54 Stipulation Extending Briefing Schedule. ORDERS the following briefing schedule for Defendants' motions (Dkt. Nos. 40 , 43 , 46 , and 47 ): Plaintiff's Opposition due 4/17/17, Defendants' Replies due 4/28/17, Noting Dates set for 4/28/17. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (SWT)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schmidt v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: George Schmidt
Represented By: Gretchen Freeman Cappio
Represented By: Cari Campen Laufenberg
Represented By: Derek W Loeser
Represented By: Lisa Nowlin
Represented By: Lynn Lincoln Sarko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Represented By: Heidi Brooks Bradley
Represented By: Kenneth L. Chernof(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Represented By: Robert J. Katerberg
Represented By: Elisabeth S. Theodore(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Represented By: Jessica Walder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samsung SDI America, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?