Brunk v. Divurgent

Brunk v. Divurgent

Plaintiff:	Allen Brunk
Defendant:	Divurgent
Case Number:	2:2016cv01780
Filed:	November 16, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office:	Seattle Office
County:	King
Presiding Judge:	Thomas S. Zilly
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 13, 2017	Filing 27 MINUTE ORDER granting plaintiff's 21 Opposed Motion to Extend Discovery Deadline and Pre-Trial Scheduling Deadlines : Bench Trial is set for 5/29/2018 at 09:00 AM before Judge Thomas S. Zilly. Discovery completed by 2/26/2018, Dispositive motions due by 3/8/2018, Motions in Limine due by 4/26/2018, Pretrial Order due by 5/11/2018, Pretrial Conference set for 5/18/2018 at 01:30 PM before Judge Thomas S. Zilly. Trial briefs to be submitted by 5/11/2018, Pr oposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law to be submitted by 5/11/2018 ; The parties are DIRECTED to serve any remaining discovery requests sufficiently early that all responses are due before the extended discovery deadline. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
July 12, 2017	Filing 15 ORDER granting Movant Dan J Donlan's 14 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney ; If plaintiff wishes to be represented by counsel, he shall arrange for an attorney authorized to practice in this Court to file a notice of appearance on or before August 16, 2017. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly.(SWT)(Attorney Dan J Donlan terminated) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 13, 2017

Filing 27 MINUTE ORDER granting plaintiff's 21 Opposed Motion to Extend Discovery Deadline and Pre-Trial Scheduling Deadlines : Bench Trial is set for 5/29/2018 at 09:00 AM before Judge Thomas S. Zilly. Discovery completed by 2/26/2018, Dispositive motions due by 3/8/2018, Motions in Limine due by 4/26/2018, Pretrial Order due by 5/11/2018, Pretrial Conference set for 5/18/2018 at 01:30 PM before Judge Thomas S. Zilly. Trial briefs to be submitted by 5/11/2018, Pr oposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law to be submitted by 5/11/2018 ; The parties are DIRECTED to serve any remaining discovery requests sufficiently early that all responses are due before the extended discovery deadline. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)

July 12, 2017

Filing 15 ORDER granting Movant Dan J Donlan's 14 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney ; If plaintiff wishes to be represented by counsel, he shall arrange for an attorney authorized to practice in this Court to file a notice of appearance on or before August 16, 2017. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly.(SWT)(Attorney Dan J Donlan terminated) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brunk v. Divurgent
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Allen Brunk
Represented By:	Dan J Donlan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Divurgent
Represented By:	Ryan Paul Hammond
Represented By:	Aurora Jane Wilson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?