Alley v. Carrington Mortgage Services LLC et al
| Esther L Alley |
| Carrington Mortgage Services LLC, Selene Finance LP, First Independent Mortgage Company Inc, Bank of America NA, MERS Inc, Recon Trust Company NA and Does |
| 2:2016cv01796 |
| November 18, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Richard A Jones |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER granting Defendant Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC's 21 Motion to Dismiss. Accordingly, Plaintiffs claims are dismissed as to Defendant Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC with prejudice. Signed by Judge Richard A. Jones. (PM) cc: plaintiff via first class mail
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER granting Defendants Selene Finance, L.P. and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.'s 12 Motion to Dismiss and denying Plaintiff's 13 Motion for Continuance. Plaintiff's claims are dismissed as to Selene Finance, L.P. and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. Signed by Judge Richard A Jones. (TH) (cc: Plaintiff via U.S. Mail)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 8 Motion to Amend and denying as moot Defendants' 6 Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for a More Definitive Statement. The Court will construe Alley's Proposed Amended Complaint the operative complaint. Dkt. # 10 . Signed by Judge Richard A Jones. (PM) cc: Plaintiff via the USPS
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
