Ruiz Fajardo Ingenieros Asociados S.A.S. v. Flow International Corporation
| Ruiz Fajardo Ingenieros Asociados S.A.S. |
| Flow International Corporation |
| 2:2016cv01902 |
| December 13, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Richard A Jones |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 84 Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs: The Court awards Ruiz Fajardo $273,582.10 in fees and costs. Signed by Judge Richard A. Jones.(MW)
|
|
Filing
108
ORDER denying Defendant's 98 Motion for New Trial. Signed by Judge Richard A. Jones.(MW)
|
|
Filing
107
ORDER granting Defendant's 91 Motion to Quash. Ruiz Fajardo's subpoena against DLA Piper is hereby QUASHED. Flow need not disclose its attorney billing records for this case. Signed by Judge Richard A. Jones. (TH)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant's 32 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment signed by Judge Richard A. Jones. (TH)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER granting Defendant's 18 Motion for Extension of Time re Case Schedule and for a Protective Order Jury Trial is set for 1/28/2019 at 09:00 AM before Judge Richard A. Jones. Discovery completed by 9/28/2018, Signed by Judge Richard A. Jones. (TH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
