Hawthorne v. Mid-Continent Casualty Company, Oklahoma Surety Company
| Patricia S Hawthorne |
| Mid-Continent Casualty Company, Oklahoma Surety Company |
| 2:2016cv01948 |
| December 21, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Robert S. Lasnik |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE within five days of the date of this Order, why she should not be sanctioned for failure to comply with Local Rule 10(e)(9), as to Plaintiff, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER granting plaintiff's 44 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint (Counsel is directed to e-file their Amended Complaint) ; granting in part and denying in part defendant's 54 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment ; granting in part and denying without prejudice in part plaintiff's 58 Renewed Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(SWT)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER denying defendant Oklahoma Surety Company's 57 Motion to Certify for Interlocutory Appeal and to Stay Litigation, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER granting in part plaintiff's 40 Motion to Compel by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (PM)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER denying Defendant's 9 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
