Hill v. King County Jail et al
| Kevin James Hill |
| King County Jail and King County Department of Public Health |
| 2:2017cv00042 |
| January 9, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| James P. Donohue |
| Richard A Jones |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDER ADOPTING 29 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's motion to dismiss (Dkt. 28 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's amended complaint (Dkt. 7 ) and this action are DISMISSED, without prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). Signed by Judge Richard A Jones. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Kevin Hill, Prisoner ID: 333860)(TH)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER denying plaintiff's 24 Motion for Extension of Time; Dispositive motions filing deadline EXTENDED to 12/11/2017, signed by Hon. James P. Donohue.**2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Kevin Hill, Prisoner ID: 333860)(SWT)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER denying plaintiff's 16 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; granting in part and denying in part plaintiff's 18 Motion for Extension of Time; Discovery completed by 9/25/2017, Dispositive motions due by 10/25/2017, signed by Hon. James P. Donohue.**3 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Kevin Hill, Prisoner ID: 333860)(RS)
|
|
Filing
14
PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER Discovery completed by 8/15/2017, Dispositive motions due by 9/15/2017, by Hon. James P. Donohue. (RS) cc plaintiff
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
