Acupuncture & Wellness Center, P.S. v. Whisnant et al
| Acupuncture & Wellness Center PS |
| Brad Whisnant and Pinpoint Acupuncture Clinic PS |
| 2:2017cv00269 |
| February 21, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| Kitsap |
| Robert S. Lasnik |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER granting parties' 25 Agreed Motion to Extend the Discovery Cuttoff are Related Dates: Discovery completed by 4/5/2018, Dispositive motions due by 5/5/2018, Attorney settlement conference to be held by 4/19/2018, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(SWT)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER granting in part defendants' 9 Motion to Dismiss, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER granting parties' 22 Stipulated Motion for Withdrawal and Substitution of Counsel, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)(Added attorney E Russell Tarleton, Thomas Shewmake for Acupuncture & Wellness Center PS. Attorney John Carl Peick terminated )
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. The parties shall, no later than Friday, September 15, 2017, file their Joint Status Report and show cause to the Court why sanctions including dismissal should not be imposed for their failure to comply with the Order of June 26, 2017. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (TH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
