Perryman et al v. City of Seattle Police et al
| Wayne Perryman and Sean Perryman |
| City of Seattle Police, Rhino Room and Justin Ismael |
| Justin Ismael |
| Sean Perryman |
| 2:2017cv00274 |
| February 21, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Richard A Jones |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
130
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL re parties' 129 Stipulation, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (KERR) (cc: Sean Perryman via U.S. Mail) Modified on 2/6/2019 (KERR).
|
|
Filing
117
ORDER striking trial and related case management dates and extending stay for another sixty (60) days, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
|
|
Filing
116
ORDER denying Defendant Justin Ismael's 115 Motion to Amend Case Schedule. This matter will remain STAYED until 6/13/2018. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
|
|
Filing
114
ORDER denying plaintiff's 106 Motion to Deny Defendants' Request re: His Vacation Time, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
|
|
Filing
107
ORDER granting Defendants' 93 Motion for Extension of Time. Expert disclosures shall be made on or before January 30, 2018, and all discovery must be completed by March 23, 2018. All other case management deadlines remain unchanged. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (TH) (cc: Plaintiff via U.S. Mail)
|
|
Filing
105
ORDER re plaintiff's 101 MOTION to Appoint Counsel; directing plaintiff to complete the attached Financial Affidavit and file it within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
|
|
Filing
98
ORDER denying plaintiff's 91 Request to Depose Defendants in Written Questions, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) cc: doublebro@aol.com per Court's instructions; Plaintiff by USPS
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER denying plaintiff Sean Perryman's 82 Request for Binding Arbitration; EXTENDING deadline for filing status report until 4:30 pm on 1/5/2018, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(SWT) (cc: Sean Perryman, Wayne Perryman via USPS)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER granting in part defendants' 81 Motion for Protective Order, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) (cc: Plaintiffs via USPS)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER granting Defendants' 58 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; claims asserted by Reverend Wayne Perryman and any claim asserted under RCW 9A.76.175 are hereby DISMISSED, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) (cc: Plaintiffs via USPS)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 46 Motion to Amend Complaint; the Court accepts the amended complaint filed on May 31, 2017 as the operativepleading in this matter, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) (cc: Plaintiffs via USPS)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER Denying Plaintiffs' 49 Second Motion for Reconsideration, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (cc: Plaintiffs via U.S. Mail) (KERR)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER denying 45 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) (cc: Plaintiffs via USPS)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER denying Plaintiffs' 15 Motion for Summary Judgment, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) (cc: Plaintiffs via USPS)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER denying as moot Defendants City of Seattle and Seattle Police Department's 29 Motion to Stay, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) (cc: Plaintiffs via USPS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
