Ross v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
| Stephanie Ross |
| Prudential Insurance Company of America and Does |
| 2:2017cv00312 |
| February 28, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| Pierce |
| James L. Robart |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Counsel having notified the Court of settlement of this case, and it appearing that no issue remains for the Court's determination, IT IS ORDERED that this action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice an d without costs to any party. In the event that settlement is not perfected, any party may move to reopen the case within 60 days of the date of this order. Any trial date and pretrial dates previously set are hereby VACATED. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (AD)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER granting 21 Stipulated Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order. Prudential to file administrative record with the Court by 4/1/2018. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (see order for details) (PM)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER FOR DE NOVO STANDARD OF REVIEW by Judge James L. Robart per 19 Stipulation. (PM)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER granting defendant Prudential Insurance Company's 8 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer; Prudential Insurance Company of America answer due 4/12/2017, by Judge James L. Robart. (SWT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
