Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. City of Seattle et al
| Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America |
| City of Seattle, Seattle Department of Finance and Administrative Services and Fred Podesta |
| 2:2017cv00370 |
| March 9, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Robert S. Lasnik |
| Antitrust |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
121
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE re Parties' 120 Stipulation: All claims and counterclaims that remain pending before the Court are dismissed without prejudice and without an award of fees or costs to any party. All claims having been resolved, this matter shall be closed. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (MW)
|
|
Filing
118
ORDER granting Parties' 117 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Notice Regarding Possession, Custody, or Control of Documents. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(MW)
|
|
Filing
116
ORDER REGARDING LCR 37 SUBMISSION re Parties' 113 Motion for Discovery: Plaintiff Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America shall, within fourteen days of the date of this Order, notify the Court whether it has the power to obtain and produce the documents requested by the City of Seattle in its First Set of Requests for Production and the date by which the production will be made (not to exceed forty-five days from the date of this Order). If the Chamber does not have tha t power and the participation of its individual members is required to resolve the claims in this litigation, the Chamber is not "an appropriate representative of its members entitled to invoke the court's jurisdiction," Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490, 511 (1975), and this case will proceed with Rasier, LLC, as the sole plaintiff. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(MW)
|
|
Filing
115
ORDER granting Parties' 114 Stipulated Motion to Renote Summary Judgment Hearing Date. Plaintiff's 100 Motion for Summary Judgment is renoted for Friday, 5/8/2020. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(MW)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER granting Parties' 108 Stipulated Motion to Renote 100 MOTION for Summary Judgment: Noting Date 2/7/2020. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(MW)
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER granting defendants' 103 Motion to Permit Discovery Necessary to Oppose Summary Judgment; RENOTING plaintiffs' 100 MOTION for Summary Judgment : Noting Date 11/22/2019. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
102
STIPULATION AND ORDER to extend motions and briefing schedule re parties' 101 Stipulated Motion, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
97
STIPULATION ORDER regarding motions and briefing schedule re parties' 95 Stipulated Motion; Joint Status Report due by 1/15/2019, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(SWT) (Calvin W Goings added. Fred Podesta terminated.)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 67 Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER granting defendants' 42 Motion to Dismiss; The preliminary injunction entered in this case on April 4, 2017, will remain in effect until the Court resolves the motion to dismiss that is pending in the companion case, Clark v. City of Seattle, C17-0382RSL. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(SWT)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER GRANTING 2 MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. The April 3rd disclosure requirements are hereby enjoined until this matter is finally resolved. (KERR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
