Sogn v. Alaska USA Federal Credit Union et al
| Daniel J. Sogn |
| Alaska USA Federal Credit Union and Careful Asset Recovery Service, Incorporated |
| 2:2017cv00432 |
| March 19, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Robert S. Lasnik |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant Alaska USA Federal Credit Union's 22 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying Defendant Car Service LLC's 25 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting Plaintiff's 31 Motion for judicial notice; granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's motion to strike evidence; granting Defendant's motion to strike evidence. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 40 Motion for Leave to Take Deposition After Discovery Cutoff. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM)
|
|
Filing
34
MINUTE ORDER re Plaintiff's 33 Objections to Evidence Submitted by Defendants on Summary Judgment. Plaintiff may re-file an amended Response no later than July 20, 2018. Thereafter, Defendants shall have until July 25, 2018 to file their Reply. Authorized by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (TH)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER Continuing Discovery Cutoff re parties' 20 Stipulation; Discovery cutoff is continued to 6/30/2018, by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (SWT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
