Waste Action Project v. Fruhling Sand & Topsoil, Inc.
Waste Action Project |
Fruhling Sand & Topsoil Inc |
2:2017cv00498 |
March 29, 2017 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
King |
Ricardo S Martinez |
Environmental Matters |
33 U.S.C. ยง 1365 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 69 AMENDED CONSENT DECREE re parties' 65 Stipulated MOTION for Entry of Amended Consent Decree. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM) |
Filing 64 CONSENT DECREE granting parties' 63 Stipulated motion for entry of consent decree. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM) |
Filing 62 ORDER granting parties' 60 Stipulated Motion to Extend the Case Schedule. Bench Trial is set for 8/17/2020 at 09:00 AM before Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. Expert Witness Disclosure/Reports under FRCP 26(a)(2) due by 2/20/2020, Motions rela ted to discovery due by 3/19/2020, Discovery completed by 4/20/2020, Dispositive motions due by 5/21/2020, 39.1 mediation to be completed by 7/6/2020, Motions in Limine due by 7/20/2020, Agreed Pretrial Order due by 8/5/2020, Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law to be submitted by 8/12/2020, Trial briefs to be submitted by 8/12/2020. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM) |
Filing 59 STIPULATION AND ORDER to Extend Case Schedule and Strike Noting Date on Summary Judgment Motion re parties' 58 Stipulated Motion: Expert Witness Disclosure/Reports under FRCP 26(a)(2) due by 11/22/2019, Motions related to discovery due by 1 2/23/2019, Discovery completed by 1/21/2020, Dispositive motions due by 2/20/2020, Motions in Limine due by 4/21/2020, Pretrial Order due by 5/6/2020, Mediation per LCR39.1(c)(3) by 4/6/2020, Trial briefs to be submitted by 5/13/2020, Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law to be submitted by 5/13/2020. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SWT) |
Filing 57 ORDER re: Parties' 56 Stipulated Motion to Extend Briefing Schedule on Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant's response due 8/8/2019; Plaintiff's reply brief due 8/16/2019. Plaintiff's 45 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment is RENOTED for 8/16/2019. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM) |
Filing 44 PROTECTIVE ORDER re parties' 43 Stipulated MOTION, by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SWT) |
Filing 39 ORDER granting parties' 37 Stipulated Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM) |
Filing 22 ORDER granting defendant's 10 Motion to Dismiss signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Waste Action Project v. Fruhling Sand & Topsoil, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Waste Action Project | |
Represented By: | Richard Adam Smith |
Represented By: | Marc Zemel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Fruhling Sand & Topsoil Inc | |
Represented By: | Denise L Ashbaugh |
Represented By: | Douglas S Morrison |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.