Yohannes v. Olympic Collection Inc (OCI) et al
Aklilu Yohannes |
Olympic Collection Inc (OCI), Farooq Ansari, Susan Cable and Norman L. Martin |
2:2017cv00509 |
March 31, 2017 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
King |
Robert S. Lasnik |
Other Personal Property Damage |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 168 ORDER granting Defendants' 150 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's motion for declaratory judgment (Dkt. # 162 ) is DENIED. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a contemporaneous dispositive motion (Dkt. # 166 ) is also DENIED. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (LH) |
Filing 149 ORDER Requiring Submission of Second Joint Status Report. Joint Status Report due by 6/3/2022. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (LH) |
Filing 141 ORDER granting defendants' motions for summary judgment, dkts. 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 ; denying plaintiff's motions for partial summary judgment and declaratory judgment, dkts. 112 , 115 ; denying defendants' 117 Motion for Protective Order, and plaintiff's 122 Cross-Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(SWT) |
Filing 137 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 87 Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(MW) |
Filing 131 ORDER denying 90 Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(MW) |
Filing 119 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to show cause, within five days of the date of this Order, why he should not be sanctioned for failure to comply with Local Rule 10(e)(9). Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (MW) |
Filing 102 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 79 Motion to Compel Response to Interrogatories. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(MW) |
Filing 101 ORDER denying 77 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(MW) |
Filing 76 ORDER on 75 LCR 37 Submission Regarding Deposition of Susan Cable. Plaintiff' s subpoena requiring Mrs. Cable to appear to be deposed on 3/28/2019, is quashed. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) |
Filing 74 ORDER granting plaintiff's 70 Motion for Judicial Notice. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) |
Filing 71 ORDER granting in part plaintiff's 62 Motion for Entry of Revised Scheduling Order: Discovery completed by 5/10/2019. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) |
Filing 63 ORDER denying Plaintiff's 41 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (TH) |
Filing 61 ORDER denying plaintiff's 52 Motion to Disqualify Defendants' Attorney; denying defendants' 54 Motion for Sanctions, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(SWT) |
Filing 38 STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Time to File Responsive Pleadings to Amended Complaint re parties' 37 Stipulated Motion, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) |
Filing 34 CERTIFICATION of Constitutional Challenge re plaintiff's 33 Proposed Certificate, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) (cc: Washington State Attorney General via USPS) |
Filing 31 ORDER granting in part defendants' 20 Motion to Dismiss; Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to amend his complaint; Plaintiff's amended complaint shall be filed within 30 days of the date of this order. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) |
Filing 17 ORDER granting in part Plaintiff's 16 Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Defendants. Plaintiff shall serve defendants by June 23, 2017. Defendants shall have twenty-one days thereafter to respond to the complaint. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.