Thomas v. Everett Association of Credit Men, Inc et al
| Deanna C. Thomas |
| Everett Association of Credit Men, Inc, Monica Jones, Branna Wickberg, Kristie Youso, Royce A. Ferguson and John/Jane Doe(s) |
| 2:2017cv00599 |
| April 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| James L. Robart |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 32 Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment. No further attorney fees will be assessed based on Plaintiff's Motion. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER granting in part defendants' 27 Motion for Attorney Fees. Plaintiff shall pay Defendants $2,691 in attorney fees. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER granting Defendants' 22 Motion for Sanctions and Dismissal; striking as moot Defendants' 19 Motion to Extend Pretrial Deadlines. This case is dismissed without prejudice. Defendants may file a motion for fees and costs no later than seven (7) days from the date of this order. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER granting Everett Parties' 15 Motion to File Motion for Sanctions for Plaintiff's Failure to Respond to Defendants' Discovery Requests. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(PM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
