Damasco v. United States of America
Editha Damasco |
United States of America |
2:2017cv00641 |
April 24, 2017 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
King |
Ricardo S Martinez |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2271 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 67 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. The Court awards Judgment for the Plaintiff against Defendant in conformity with this order. (PM) |
Filing 58 ORDER granting 50 Stipulated Motion Re: Offering Portions of Depositions at Trial. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM) |
Filing 49 ORDER REGARDING DEPOSITION TESTIMONY AT TRIAL directing parties to provide briefing on the admissibility of the proposed deposition testimony in this action by 12:00 p.m. tomorrow, June 26, 2018. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM) |
Filing 43 PRETRIAL ORDER signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM) |
Filing 35 MINUTE ORDER directing Defendant to respond to motions ( 31 MOTION to Exclude Expert Testimony of Ashely Giesa, 33 MOTION to Exclude Expert Testimony of Peggy A. Shibata) by 12:00 PM on Monday, 6/18/2018. Authorized by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (SWT) |
Filing 30 ORDER granting parties' 29 Stipulated Motion; Bench Trial is CONTINUED to 6/25/2018 before Judge Ricardo S Martinez. Pretrial dates revised as follows: Pretrial Order due by 6/13/2018, Trial briefs to be submitted by 6/20/2018, Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law to be submitted by 6/20/2018. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (SWT) |
Filing 28 ORDER granting 26 Stipulated Motion to Extend Pretrial Dates and Setting a New Trial Date. Bench Trial is continued to 5/29/2018 before Judge Ricardo S Martinez. Motions in Limine due by 5/1/2018, Pretrial Order due by 5/17/2018, Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law to be submitted by 5/24/2018, Trial briefs to be submitted by 5/24/2018. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM) |
Filing 16 STIPULATION AND ORDER extending Expert Disclosure deadline re parties' 15 Stipulated Motion : Expert Witness Disclosure/Reports under FRCP 26(a)(2) due by 11/30/2017, signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(SWT) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting 9 Stipulated Motion to amend initial pleadings signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting 5 Stipulated Motion to extend initial scheduling dates; FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 7/13/2017, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 7/20/2017, Joint Status Report due by 7/27/2017, by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Damasco v. United States of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Editha Damasco | |
Represented By: | David Hugh Zielke |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United States of America | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.