Batrouny et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
| Talal Batrouny, Zeina Chalak and Tarek Batrouny |
| State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
| 2:2017cv00715 |
| May 8, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Thomas S. Zilly |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Counsel having advised the Court that this matter has been resolved, see Notice of Settlement (docket no. 20 ), and it appearing that no issue remains for the Court's determination, IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSE D with prejudice and without costs. In the event settlement is not perfected, any party may move to reopen and trial will be scheduled, provided such motion is filed within 60 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
17
MINUTE ORDER granting parties' 16 Joint Motion to Extend Certain Deadlines: Discovery deadline EXTENDED to 8/23/2018, Expert Witness Disclosure/Reports under FRCP 26(a)(2) deadline EXTENDED to 5/23/2018. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
7
STIPULATION AND ORDER for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re parties' 5 Stipulation; State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company answer due 5/30/2017, by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
