UN4 Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al
| UN4 Productions, Inc. |
| Doe 1, Doe 2, Doe 3, Doe 4, Doe 5, Doe 6, Doe 7, Doe 8, Doe 9, Doe 10 and Doe 11 |
| 2:2017cv00786 |
| May 19, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Robert S. Lasnik |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER granting in part and denying in part plaintiff UN4's Motions for Default Judgment against defendants Dimitria Omelco and Marlene Reynier (Dkts. 38 , 40 ). The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendants for the amounts specified in this Order. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 27 Second Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff has not shown good cause for a second extension of time. The claims against Ms. Falngin are DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (TH) (cc: Defendant Sylvia T. Falngin via U.S. Mail)
|
|
Filing
18
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF SUBSTITUTION re parties' 16 Motion to Substitute; Sylvia T. Falngin added. Jacklyn Famaw (an individual) terminated. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(TH)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER granting plaintiff's 11 Motion for Extension of Time signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(RS)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 5 Motion for Expedited Discovery, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
