Bereket v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC et al
| Abby Bereket |
| Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC and John Does 1-25 |
| 2:2017cv00812 |
| May 24, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Mary Alice Theiler |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 77 Unopposed Motion to Decertify and Send Notice to the Class and Dismiss Individual Claims. Within 45 days of this Order, Plaintiff's counsel SHALL provide notice, to all members of the certified class, of th e Court's action in a form substantially like the proposed Notice of Decertification of Class Action and Need to Take Action to Preserve Claims (Dkt. # 78 at 56). The Court DECERTIFIES the class previously certified in the Court's November 30,2018 Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification and Denying Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Counterclaim and Third-Party Complaint (Dkt. # 66 at 23). All of Plaintiff's claims, as asserted in Plaintiffs Complaint (Dkt. # 1 ) are DISMISSED with prejudice. This matter is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER granting Defendant's 69 Motion for Extension of Time to Provide Class Data. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 55 Motion for Class Certification; denying Defendant's 59 Motion for Leave to File Counterclaim and Third-Party Complaint. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER granting Defendant's 34 Motion to Compel; striking Plaintiff's 33 Motion for class certification. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER OF CLARIFICATION re: Plaintiff's request for clarification 49 . Briefing is complete on Plaintiff's 33 Motion to Certify Class and on Defendant's 34 Motion to Compel. The Court will consider these motions in due course. P laintiff shall not file any further documents related to the pending motions. The Clerk is directed to change the description of Plaintiff's 40 "Reply to Response to Motion" to "Response to Motion to Compel". The Clerk sha ll STRIKE Dkts. # 42 , # 43 , # 44 -2, # 44 -3 and # 44 -4 as UNTIMELY. The Clerk shall STRIKE the Third Party Motion to Quash at Dkts. 41 , # 44 , # 44 -1, # 44 -2, # 44 -3 and # 44 -4. Mr. Rodriguez has failed to appear in this matter either p ro se or through counsel. Prior to making any additional filings in this matter, PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL SHALL review the Court's Local Civil Rules, and the Court's Electronic Filing Procedures, all of which are available on the Court's website. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
32
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER re parties' 31 Stipulated MOTION and Protective Order, signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER denying Defendant's 13 Motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The deadlines pertaining to class certification, as amended on September 26, 2017 (Dkt. # 22 ), remain in place. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
22
STIPULATION AND ORDER by parties re 19 MOTION for Extension of Time regarding Class Certification Deadlines. Deadline to complete discovery on class certification (not to be construed as a bifurcation of discovery) is extended from 10/20/2017 to 12/22/2017. Deadline for Plaintiffs to file motion for class certification is extended from 11/17/2017 to 1/19/2018. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (TH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
