King County v. City of Sammamish
Plaintiff: King County
Defendant: City of Sammamish
Case Number: 2:2017cv00921
Filed: June 14, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Seattle Office
County: King
Presiding Judge: John C Coughenour
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 60 MINUTE ORDER: The parties have filed a stipulation and proposed order of dismissal (Dkt. No. 59 ). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A), this stipulation is self-executing, and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without an award of costs or attorney fees to either party. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (MW)
September 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 57 MINUTE ORDER granting parties' 56 Stipulated Motion to continue the trial date and pretrial deadlines.Trial is CONTINUED to 1/27/2020 at 9:30 a.m.; The pretrial order shall be filed no later than 1/17/2020; Trial briefs shall be filed no later than 1/23/2020; Discovery shall be completed 120 days before trial; and Dispositive motions shall be filed no later than 90 days before trial. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
October 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 53 MINUTE ORDER re parties' 52 Stipulated Motion and Order to Set Status Conference. The Court ORDERS counsel for both parties to appear for a status conference at 9:00 A.M. on October 23, 2018, for the purpose of entering a case schedule. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
September 1, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 43 MINUTE ORDER granting parties' 42 stipulation and proposed revision to the preliminary injunction order of August 8, 2017; noting date of September 8, 2017 for 40 Motion for Clarification is stricken. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
August 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 41 MINUTE ORDER RE-NOTING Defendant City of Sammamish's 40 MOTION for Reconsideration re 36 Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction ; Noting Date 9/8/2017, Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (SWT)
August 8, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER granting plaintiff King County's 7 Motion for Preliminary Injunction signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour.(RS)
July 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MINUTE ORDER deferring ruling on Defendant's 16 Motion to Dismiss. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (SWT)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: King County v. City of Sammamish
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: King County
Represented By: David Ian Freeburg
Represented By: David JW Hackett
Represented By: Emily J Harris
Represented By: Mallory L. Satre
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Sammamish
Represented By: Michael R Kenyon
Represented By: David A Linehan
Represented By: Kim Adams Pratt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?