King County v. City of Sammamish
| King County |
| City of Sammamish |
| 2:2017cv00921 |
| June 14, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| John C Coughenour |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
MINUTE ORDER: The parties have filed a stipulation and proposed order of dismissal (Dkt. No. 59 ). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A), this stipulation is self-executing, and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without an award of costs or attorney fees to either party. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (MW)
|
|
Filing
57
MINUTE ORDER granting parties' 56 Stipulated Motion to continue the trial date and pretrial deadlines.Trial is CONTINUED to 1/27/2020 at 9:30 a.m.; The pretrial order shall be filed no later than 1/17/2020; Trial briefs shall be filed no later than 1/23/2020; Discovery shall be completed 120 days before trial; and Dispositive motions shall be filed no later than 90 days before trial. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
|
|
Filing
53
MINUTE ORDER re parties' 52 Stipulated Motion and Order to Set Status Conference. The Court ORDERS counsel for both parties to appear for a status conference at 9:00 A.M. on October 23, 2018, for the purpose of entering a case schedule. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
|
|
Filing
43
MINUTE ORDER granting parties' 42 stipulation and proposed revision to the preliminary injunction order of August 8, 2017; noting date of September 8, 2017 for 40 Motion for Clarification is stricken. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
|
|
Filing
41
MINUTE ORDER RE-NOTING Defendant City of Sammamish's 40 MOTION for Reconsideration re 36 Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction ; Noting Date 9/8/2017, Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER granting plaintiff King County's 7 Motion for Preliminary Injunction signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour.(RS)
|
|
Filing
29
MINUTE ORDER deferring ruling on Defendant's 16 Motion to Dismiss. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (SWT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: King County v. City of Sammamish | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: King County | |
| Represented By: | David Ian Freeburg |
| Represented By: | David JW Hackett |
| Represented By: | Emily J Harris |
| Represented By: | Mallory L. Satre |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City of Sammamish | |
| Represented By: | Michael R Kenyon |
| Represented By: | David A Linehan |
| Represented By: | Kim Adams Pratt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
