Cale v. United States of America
| Edward Cale |
| United States of America |
| 2:2017cv01099 |
| July 20, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| John C Coughenour |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER granting Defendant's 35 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's claims are hereby dismissed without leave to amend. Having dismissed his claims, the Court hereby DENIES Plaintiff's recent request for appointment of counsel. (Dkt. No. 48 .) Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 39 Motion to Seal without prejudice. Plaintiff is directed to review and comply with Local Rule 5(g), which sets forth the requirements which must be met before court records may be sealed or redacted. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM)
|
|
Filing
42
MINUTE ORDER re plaintiff's 41 Stipulated MOTION to Seal; the Court will consider Dkt. No. 41 as an additional submission in support of Dkt. No. 39 and not as a separate motion. Authorized by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
40
MINUTE ORDER re-noting Plaintiff's 39 MOTION to Seal for 3/30/2018. Defendant's response due 3/28/2018. Authorized by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM)
|
|
Filing
33
MINUTE ORDER authorized by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. The Court has reviewed the affidavit and finds that Plaintiff has effected proper service on Defendants. The trial date and related dates previously set by the Court remain in effect. (Dkt. No. 27 .) (PM)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 28 Motion Regarding Service and ORDER for Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE by 1/19/2018 why this matter should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER striking Plaintiff's 22 Motion to Set Trial Schedule. Parties are directed to comply with the Court's orders and file a Joint Status Report by November 3, 2017. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 17 Motion to Seal, signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM) cc: plaintiff via first class mail
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER granting Defendant's 4 Motion of Substitution. The United States of America is substituted as the party Defendant in place of and instead of Defendant Navdeep Dhaliwal. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (PM) cc: plaintiff via the U.S. Mail
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cale v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Edward Cale | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Sarah K Morehead |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
