Jiao v. Blumenthal et al
Jie Jiao |
Connie Blumenthal, John Doe Blumenthal and Realogics Brokerage LLC |
2:2017cv01355 |
September 8, 2017 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
King |
John C Coughenour |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 51 MINUTE ORDER dismissing this action with prejudice and without an award of costs to any party; re parties' 49 Stipulation. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (SWT) |
Filing 50 ORDER granting Plaintiffs/Counter Defendants Wei Fan and Maoqi Zhang's 48 Motion to Dismiss Counter-Claim. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH) |
Filing 34 ORDER granting in part Plaintiff's 18 Motion to Amend. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to docket the proposed revised First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 30 at 4-18) within ten (10) days of this order. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH) |
Filing 22 MINUTE ORDER re parties' 21 Stipulation. The law firm of Lane Powell PC is granted leave to withdraw as attorneys of record for Defendant Blumenthal, effective immediately. J. Dino Vasquez of Karr Tuttle Campbell shall be substituted as counsel of record for Defendant Blumenthal. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH) |
Filing 16 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (SWT) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.