Leal de la Hoz v. Sprint Corporation
Plaintiff: Helio J Leal de la Hoz
Defendant: Sprint Corporation
Case Number: 2:2017cv01362
Filed: September 10, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Seattle Office
County: King
Presiding Judge: John C Coughenour
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 29, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER re 7 Correspondence from Plaintiff Helio J. Leal de la Hoz. The Court dismissed Plaintiff's complaint without prejudice for failure to plead an amount in controversy sufficient to support diversity jurisdiction. (Dkt. Nos. 5 , 6 .) Plaintiff may re-file his complaint if he is able to allege sufficient facts to support jurisdiction. The Court's dismissal does not preclude Plaintiff from bringing his action in the appropriate state court. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH) (cc: Plaintiff via U.S. Mail)
November 16, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER. On September 12, 2017 this Court issued an order to show cause why the Court may exercise jurisdiction in this case (Dkt. No. 5 ). Plaintiff failed to respond during the allotted time. Finding no basis for subject matter jurisdiction clear from the complaint, the Court DIMISSES Plaintiff's complaint (Dkt. No. 1 -1) without prejudice. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH) (cc: Plaintiff via U.S. Mail)
September 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause why this Court may exercise jurisdiction in this case. Plaintiff may do so by filing an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the issuance of this order. If Plaintiff fails to show that this Court may exercise jurisdiction, dismissal would not preclude Plaintiff from bringing his action in the appropriate Washington State court. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH) (cc: Plaintiff)
September 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting Plaintiff's 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis signed by Hon. James P. Donohue.(TH) (cc: Plaintiff via U.S. Mail)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Leal de la Hoz v. Sprint Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Helio J Leal de la Hoz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sprint Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?