Capitol Pros, Inc v. Vadata, Inc
| Capitol Pros, Inc |
| Vadata, Inc |
| 2:2017cv01410 |
| September 18, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| John C Coughenour |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER granting Defendant's 24 Motion for Summary Judgment signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant's 15 Motion to Dismiss signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
|
|
Filing
17
MINUTE ORDER granting parties' 16 Stipulated Motion to modify the briefing schedule for Defendant's 15 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . The Court hereby ORDERS that the deadline for Plaintiff to oppose Defendan t's motion (Dkt. 15 ) shall be January 8, 2018 and the deadline for Defendant to file a Reply shall be modified to January 19, 2018. Defendant's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 15 ) is renoted to January 19, 2018. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
|
|
Filing
14
MINUTE ORDER granting parties' 13 Stipulated Motion to extend the deadline for Defendant Vadata Inc. to answer the complaint. Vadata shall have until November 30, 2017 to answer the complaint. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
