Jackson v. Mallott et al
Michael E. Jackson |
Orville B. Mallott and Washington State Patrol |
2:2017cv01521 |
October 6, 2017 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
King |
Robert S. Lasnik |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 ORDER denying plaintiff's 28 Motion for Transcripts at Government's Expense; denying as moot plaintiff's request to ensure the Ninth Circuit is aware of district court case number, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS, 9th Circuit via ad hoc) |
Filing 27 ORDER signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik denying 26 Motion. This matter comes before the Court on petitioners Motion for Certificate of Appealability 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) which provides: An appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies in writing that it is not taken in good faith. An appeal that is frivolous or otherwise without merit is not taken in good faith. The Court is of the opinion that plaintiffs appeal is frivolous. He has not alleged any facts from wh ich one could conclude that the Court has subject matter jurisdiction over his claims. Thus, the Court certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith and revokes plaintiff's in forma pauperis status. (CDA)cc 9th Circuit via ECF, plaintiff via US Mail |
Filing 23 ORDER OF DISMISSAL granting plaintiff's 7 Motion to Amend Complaint; denying plaintiff's 18 Motion to Appoint Mediator; denying plaintiff's 20 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying plaintiff's 22 Motion to Dismiss Claims against the Doe Officer, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS) |
Filing 14 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why the complaint should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; Plaintiff shall, within thirty (30) days of this order, file an amended complaint which remedies the deficiencies, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting plaintiff's 11 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, signed by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler. (SWT) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS) (Plaintiff's 10 IFP Motion terminated) |
Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER directing plaintiff to submit a completed IFP application, with signatures on both the IFP and Written Consent portions of the form, within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order. Authorized by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler. (SWT) (cc: Plaintiff with IFP form) |
Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER directing Plaintiff to complete and return the correct IFP form within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order, authorized by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler. (SWT) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS with forms) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.