Chen et al v. Feast Buffet, Inc. et al
| Jinglin Chen, Maohung Lin, Mingfeng Cai, Xiangnan Liu, Xu Zhao, Yue Li and Yujay Wang |
| Feast Buffet, Inc, Sunshine Career Service and Does 1-25 |
| 2:2017cv01584 |
| October 24, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| XX US, Outside District |
| James L. Robart |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER re: Stipulated Motion to Consolidate (filed in C17-1581RSM) signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. IT IS ORDERED that cases C17-1581-RSM, C17-1583-RSM and C17-1584-RSM are consolidated through trial. All further filings must be filed in C17-1581RSM. (PM)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER granting 16 Stipulated Motion for Withdrawal and Substitution. Attorney Deirdre Glynn Levin is permitted to substitute as local counsel for Plaintiffs and Attorney Yong J Han is permitted to withdraw. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER dismissing Defendant Sunshine Career Service without prejudice. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER by Judge James L. Robart. The court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE within 10 days of the date of this order why Defendant Sunshine Career Service should not be dismissed for failure to comply with Rule 4(m). (AD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
