Microsoft Corporation v. John Does 1-10 using IP address 73.28.34.136
| Microsoft Corporation |
| John Does 1-10 using IP address 73.28.34.136 and John Does 1 - 10 |
| 2:2017cv01587 |
| October 25, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Ricardo S Martinez |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1121 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 17 Motion to Vacate Deadlines in the Court's Order Regarding Initial Disclosures, Joint Status Report and Early Settlement. FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 12/14/2017, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 12/21/2017, Joint Status Report due by 12/28/2017. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 11 Motion to Expedite Discovery. Plaintiff may immediately serve on Comcast IP Services, LLP (or its associated downstream ISPs) a Rule 45 subpoena to obtain documents and/or information toidentify John Does 1-10. At this time, any documents requests shall be limited to documents sufficient to identify all names, physical addresses, PO boxes, electronic addresses (including email addresses), telephone numbers, or other customer identifying information that are or have been associated with the IP address 73.156.69.83. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (TH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
