NIRP Pasadena PLLC et al v. Medstreaming LLC et al
Plaintiff: NIRP Pasadena PLLC and NIRP Sugar Land PLLC
Defendant: Medstreaming LLC, Wael Elseaidy and Ryan Plasch
Case Number: 2:2017cv01607
Filed: October 27, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Seattle Office
County: King
Presiding Judge: Thomas S. Zilly
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 79 MINUTE ORDER granting parties' 78 Stipulated Motion to Amend Deadline: Dispositive motions due by 4/17/2019; denying defendants' 69 Motion for Sanctions. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
February 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 71 MINUTE ORDER granting parties' 68 Stipulated Motion to continue the trial date and related dates and deadlines. Bench Trial **5 Days** is set for 6/24/2019 at 09:00 AM before Judge Thomas S. Zilly, Discovery completed by 3/28/2019, Disposit ive motions due by 4/11/2019, motions related to expert witnesses due 4/18/2019, 39.1 mediation to be completed by 4/25/2019, Motions in Limine due by 5/23/2019, Agreed Pretrial Order due by 6/7/2019, Trial briefs, Proposed Findings of Fact to be submitted by 6/7/2019, Pretrial Conference set for 6/14/2019 at 11:00 AM before Judge Thomas S. Zilly. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (PM)
September 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 54 MINUTE ORDER. The law firm of Corr Cronin, LLP and the law firm of Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC are each sanctioned $500 in connection with the frivolous motion for partial summary judgment, docket no. 30 , that they file d on behalf of plaintiffs. Each firm shall pay such amount to the Washington State Bar Foundation, a 501(c)(3) charity, and shall file proof of such payment within seven (7) days of the date of this Minute Order. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (TH)
September 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 53 MINUTE ORDER. Bench Trial is set for 5/6/2019 at 09:00 AM before Judge Thomas S. Zilly. Expert Witness Disclosure/Reports under FRCP 26(a)(2) due by 12/31/2018, Motions related to discovery due by 1/3/2019, Discovery completed by 1/31/2019, Dispositive motions due by 2/14/2019, 39.1 mediation to be completed by 3/11/2019, Motions in Limine due by 4/4/2019, Pretrial Order due by 4/19/2019, Trial briefs to be submitted by 4/19/2019, Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law to be submitted by 4/19/2019, Pretrial Conference set for 4/26/2019 at 01:30 PM before Judge Thomas S. Zilly. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (TH)
August 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 50 MINUTE ORDER denying plaintiffs' 30 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; directing plaintiffs and counsel to SHOW CAUSE within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Minute Order why the Court should not impose sanctions; granting in part and deferring in part defendants' 44 Motion to Amend Case Schedule; striking trial date of 10/1/2018, pretrial conference scheduled for 9/21/2018 and related deadlines; SETTING Telephone Conference for 8/30/2018 at 11:00 AM; denying defendants' 32 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
June 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MINUTE ORDER denying defendants' 17 Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings; striking as moot movant Balboa Capital's 21 Motion for Protective Order; granting defendant Medstreaming's 23 Motion for Protective Order. (See Minute Order for details.) Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NIRP Pasadena PLLC et al v. Medstreaming LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Medstreaming LLC
Represented By: Hozaifa Y Cassubhai
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wael Elseaidy
Represented By: Hozaifa Y Cassubhai
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ryan Plasch
Represented By: Hozaifa Y Cassubhai
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NIRP Pasadena PLLC
Represented By: Lawrence Ronald Cock
Represented By: Lori Hood(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Represented By: Jack Lovejoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NIRP Sugar Land PLLC
Represented By: Lawrence Ronald Cock
Represented By: Lori Hood(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Represented By: Jack Lovejoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?