MUFG Union Bank, NA v. Tyler et al
| MUFG Union Bank, NA |
| Aaron Tyler, John Fogliani, Jessica Allis, Heidi Brindle, Bianca Mack, Wendy McKenzie, Micaela Meza, Darrick Cox and U.S. Bank |
| 2:2017cv01766 |
| November 22, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| XX US, Outside District |
| Ricardo S Martinez |
| Other Labor Litigation |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1836 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
88
STIPULATION AND ORDER dismissing all claims with prejudice and without attorneys' fees re parties' 87 Stipulation, by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER granting Defendants' 81 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's CFAA claim against them will be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
85
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 62 63 Motions to Dismiss. Any amended complaint to be filed within 20 days this order. Plaintiff's First, Second and Fourth Claims for Relief are DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff's Third and Fifth Claims for trade misappropriation under state and federal law will proceed at this time. Defendant U.S. Bank's 71 Motion to Stay Discovery is denied as moot. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 5 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER granting Defendants' 17 Motion for Leave to File Over-Length Brief in Opposition to Union Bank's 5 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
12
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: Plaintiff's 5 Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction. Judge Martinez will hold a hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, on Thursday, December 7, 2017, at 2:00 p.m., at which time Defendants will be asked to Show Cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue. Any supplemental response to motion due at 5:00 p.m. on 12/5/2017; Reply due at 12:00 p.m. on 12/6/2017. Signed by Judge Richard A Jones on behalf of Chief Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
