Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, N.A. v. Markoff
Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, N.A. |
Jonathan K. Markoff |
2:2017cv01862 |
December 13, 2017 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
King |
John C Coughenour |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 49 MINUTE ORDER re parties' 48 Joint Motion for Order of Dismissal. The case is DISMISSED without prejudice and with the parties bearing their own attorney fees and costs, except as provided for in the parties' settlement agreement. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH) |
Filing 47 MINUTE ORDER re parties' 46 Stipulation: Trial in this case shall be a bench trial before the Court, and the parties need not submit proposed voir dire and jury instructions in this case. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (MW) |
Filing 44 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 24 Motion for Summary Judgment and denying Defendant's 28 Motion for Summary Judgment signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH) |
Filing 43 ORDER denying as moot Plaintiff's 38 Motion to Compel the Defendant's tax returns and Plaintiff's request for attorney fees incurred in preparing its motion to compel (Dkt. No. 40 ) is GRANTED. Defendant is ORDERED to pay Plaintiff $7,128. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH) |
Filing 42 MINUTE ORDER granting parties' 41 Stipulated Motion for Continuance of Trial Date. The trial date in this matter is hereby EXTENDED to Monday, June 17, 2019, at 9:30 A.M. The proposed pretrial order shall be filed no later than June 7, 2019. Trial briefs and proposed voir dire and jury instructions shall be filed no later than June 10, 2019. Counsel shall attend Courtroom Technology Training at least one month in advance of the trial date. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH) |
Filing 22 MINUTE ORDER granting parties' 21 Stipulation for Leave to Allow Plaintiff to File A Supplemental Complaint to Reflect Name Change Under Fed. R. CIV. P. 15(d). Plaintiff shall file and serve a Supplemental Complaint reflecting Plaintiff's name change. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH) |
Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER granting parties' 14 Stipulation and Order Extending Time for Defendant to Answer Initial Complaint . Defendant must answer or otherwise reply to Plaintiff's complaint on or before May 2, 2018. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, N.A. v. Markoff | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, N.A. | |
Represented By: | Jesse S Finlayson(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice) |
Represented By: | Leslie Carol Nellermoe |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Jonathan K. Markoff | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.