Apple Inc v. Mobile Star LLC
Plaintiff: Apple Inc
Defendant: Mobile Star LLC
Case Number: 2:2017mc00070
Filed: July 11, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Seattle Office
Presiding Judge: Robert S. Lasnik
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 25, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. This matter comes before the Court on Amazon.com, Inc.s opposition to plaintiffs motion to compel compliance with a third-party subpoena. In light of the opposition, the Clerk of Court is directed to give this matter a civil action number and assign it in rotation. (CDA)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Apple Inc v. Mobile Star LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Apple Inc
Represented By: Charles J Ha
Represented By: Aravind Swaminathan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mobile Star LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?