Baker v. Gates et al
Dr. Nathen Baker and Nathen Dwayne Baker |
William H. Gates, Mike Pence, Paul G. Allen, Microsoft Corporation and Microsoft Investors Relation |
2:2018cv00059 |
January 16, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
King |
John C Coughenour |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 LETTER to the Court filed by Nathen Dwayne Baker. (address updated per envelope) (MW) |
Filing 6 JUDGMENT BY COURT. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. (TH) (cc: Plaintiff via first class mail) |
Filing 5 ORDER ADOPTING #4 Report and Recommendation. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH) |
Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Objections to R&R due by 3/19/2018, Noting Date 3/23/2018, by Hon. James P. Donohue. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proposed Judgment) (TH) (cc: Plaintiff via first class mail) |
Filing 3 ORDER denying Plaintiff's #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is GRANTED LEAVE TO AMEND his IFP and shall have 30 days from the date of this Order to correct the deficiencies. Signed by Hon. James P. Donohue. (TH) (cc: Plaintiff via U.S. Mail) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis before Judge Donohue, filed by Nathen Baker. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(DJ) Modified on 1/18/2018 (DJ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.