Burke v. Professional Transportation, Inc
Geraldine Burke |
Professional Transportation, Inc |
2:2018cv00081 |
January 18, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
Clallam |
James L. Robart |
Fair Labor Standards Act |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1938 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 53 ORDER granting parties' 51 Stipulated Motion for Approval of Confidential Settlement of FLSA Claims and for Dismissal of All Claims With Prejudice. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (SWT) |
Filing 49 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Counsel having notified the Court of settlement of this case, and it appearing that no issue remains for the Court's determination, IT IS ORDERED that this action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice an d without costs to any party. In the event that settlement is not perfected, any party may move to reopen the case within 60 days of the date of this order. Any trial date and pretrial dates previously set are hereby VACATED. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (AD) |
Filing 36 ORDER striking without prejudice plaintiff's 34 Motion to Compel Discovery. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (SWT) |
Filing 31 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 20 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying Defendant's 23 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond signed by Judge James L. Robart. (TH) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.