Spesock et al v. U.S. Bank NA et al
| Jeffrey Spesock and Janet Spesock |
| U.S. Bank, NA, Bank of America, NA, LaSalle Bank, NA and Residential Funding Company, LLC |
| 2:2018cv00092 |
| January 22, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| Snohomish |
| James L. Robart |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Residential Funding Company, LLC without prejudice, by Judge James L. Robart. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why the court should not dismiss plaintiffs' claims against defendant Residential Funding for failure to prosecute. Show Cause Response due by 10/31/2018. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER denying plaintiffs' 18 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting defendants' 21 Cross Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing this action with prejudice. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
12
SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION signed by Judge James L. Robart. The Trust's show cause response is due within 7 days of this Order. (PM)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: subject matter jurisdiction. The Trust is directed to file a response within 7 days of this order. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
