Tate v. Smith et al
| Eddie Tate |
| Tre Smith, Shaun Hilton, Unknown Police Officers and The City of Seattle |
| 2:2018cv00141 |
| January 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Robert S. Lasnik |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
ORDER GRANTING in Part and DENYING in Part Defendants' 32 MOTION to Exclude the Opinion of Gregory Gilbertson. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (MW)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER granting Defendants' 24 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(MW)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER granting in part Defendants' 55 Motion to Stay Trial and RelatedDeadlines Pending Disposition of Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (TH)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER granting Defendants' 45 Motion to Seal: Dkt. # 49 and Dkt. # 50 will remain under seal. In addition, the Clerk of Court is directed to seal Dkt. # 44-1, Dkt. # 44-2, and Dkt. # 44-3. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(MW)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER granting Parties' 22 Stipulated Motion to Seal. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(MW)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER re Parties' 20 Stipulated Motion To Extend Settlement Deadlines: Settlement conference to be held by 11/12/2019. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(MW)
|
|
Filing
17
PROTECTIVE ORDER re parties' 16 Stipulation, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
