Deeter-Larsen et al v. Whatcom Humane Society et al
| Kellie Deeter-Larsen and Lawrence E. Larsen |
| Whatcom Humane Society, Laura A. Clark, Whatcom County, Washington, Rebecca Crowley, Washington State Department of Agriculture and Amber Itle |
| 2:2018cv00300 |
| February 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| Whatcom |
| Richard A Jones |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
95
ORDER granting Defendants Itle and Washington State Department of Agriculture's 85 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting Defendants Whatcom Humane Society, Laura A. Clark, and Rebecca Crowley's 93 Motion to Strike Section of Response Brief: The Clerk is directed to enter judgment for Defendants Amber Itle and Washington State Department of Agriculture on all remaining claims. Signed by Judge Richard A. Jones.(MW)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 28 Motion To Dismiss Defamation Claims and/or to Bar Defamation Damages. The Court DISMISSES Plaintiffs' defamation claim (Count VII). Plaintiffs are given leave to amend their defamation claim within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order. The Court DENIES Defendants' request to bar Plaintiffs from seeking defamation damages at this time. Signed by Judge Richard A. Jones. (TH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
