Ramzan et al v. Nielsen et al
| Khatidja M. Ramzan, Murtaza M. Ramzan and Saveen M. Ramzan |
| Kirstjen M. Nielsen, L. Francis Cissna, Cynthia Munita and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services |
| 2:2018cv00332 |
| March 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Robert S. Lasnik |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
STIPULATION AND ORDER re parties' 11 Stipulated MOTION for Order of Dismissal. This case is dismissed without an award of costs to either party. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (TH)
|
|
Filing
10
STIPULATION AND ORDER of Abeyance Pending Adjudication and for Dismissal of Claims re parties' 9 Stipulated MOTION. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case will be stayed until December 17, 2018, pending the reopening and further adjudic ation of Plaintiff Khatidja and Murtaza Ramzan's I-485 applications; That Plaintiff Khatidja and Murtaza Ramzan will remain eligible to file extensions of their work authorization pending issuance of new decisions by USCIS on their I-485 applications and requests for relief under INA § 204(l); That Plaintiff Saveen Ramzan claims against Defendants may be dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (TH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
