Borreggine v. ProKarma Inc et al
| Peter Borreggine |
| ProKarma Inc, Vivek Kumar and Heather Kelly |
| 2:2018cv00336 |
| March 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| Skagit |
| Ricardo S Martinez |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
AMENDED ORDER granting Defendants' 18 MOTION to Dismiss. Plaintiff's claims are dismissed in their entirety. This matter is now closed. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER granting Defendants' 18 Motion to Dismiss. The Court declines to grant leave to amend. The Court concludes that granting leave to amend the dismissed claims would be futile given the Court's lack of jurisdiction over Plaintiff's claims. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
24
MINUTE ORDER denying as moot Plaintiff's 22 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages authorized by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (TH)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER denying without prejudice Plaintiff's 6 Motion to Appoint Counsel. This Order does not preclude Plaintiff from refiling this Motion once a factual record pertaining to his claims has been more fully developed. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis signed by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler. (PM) cc: plaintiff via first class mail
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
